Forensic Science Laboratories in India: A Systemic Crisis and Reformative Framework for Justice in Criminal Trials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28945/ijikm.v20i2.92Abstract
This paper explores the systemic delays in the functioning of Forensic Science Laboratories (FSLs) in India, focusing specifically on the States of Punjab and Haryana. These delays, notably in matters concerning the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, which obstruct the prompt administration of justice and infringe upon the fundamental right to a swift trial, as protected under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution[1]. The recent BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)[2] clause under Section 176(3), requiring forensic participation in major offenses, marks a forward-looking initiative, though its effectiveness depends on resolving current obstacles. This study examines the primary reasons for these delays, such as insufficient facilities, a shortage of trained staff, budgetary constraints, and ineffective case handling. It also proposes a thorough set of solutions to tackle these problems. Utilizing insights from expert panels appointed by the Court, the paper presents a systematic plan to reform the system, aiming to enhance the effectiveness, clarity, and responsibility of FSLs. Adopting these changes could not only accelerate forensic evaluations but also ensure that the criminal justice system adheres to constitutional standards. Furthermore, the paper underscores the essential role forensic science plays within the Indian criminal justice framework, pointing out that its current impact is restricted by infrastructural and resource limitations. Relying on empirical evidence, judicial rulings, and expert insights, the paper provides a detailed strategy to overcome these hurdles and reinforce the contribution of forensic science to achieving justice.



